
Linkdump
[beginning of fragment]
...about the nature of Islam. Admit that the is Islam is not a religion. Admit that the is Islam is totalitaran ideology. In other words: The right to religious freedom do not apply to this totalitaran ideology called Islam.
Stop, also, the mass immigration from people from muslim countries. (applause) Stop the immigration of muslims... (applause) And besides ... encourage the repatriation to the same countries.
And, ladies and gentlemen, for those people who are already in our country, for those muslims who are already in our societies, if they behave, if they assimilate according to our rules, of course they are equal to anybody else. But if they become criminal, if they act in a criminal way, please don't send them to a social worker, send them abroad, de-naturalise them, send them... (applause)
Ladies and gentlemen, I have many other solutions. But the most important thing I believe is that we should get rid of weak leadership. (applause) [the lack of leaders in Europe?]
We have... All of us have the privilege of living in a democracy. Let's use that privilege and exchange all those cowards that are leading so many countries of the world, exchange those cowards for hero's. We need more Churchills, and we need less [gentlemens?]
In fact, in fact, we have to go on the offensive. We have to stand up and stop fighting back, we must no longer allow ourselves to remain seated in our cosy armchairs and get trembled over. If they bombard us with sharia law, we will bombard them back with our human rights. If they bombard us with court cases, we shall bombard them back with our court cases. We have to fight back, ladies and gentlemen. millions, millions of people in the world are sick and tired of it all. They refuse to take any more of this cowardness. We must make it clear, we must make it clear to all those people that millions of us, millions of freedom loving people are saying: "enough is enough". (applause)
And this in fact is the reason that last week I announced the sequel, another movie in the next, the year 2010, the sequel of Fitna 2. The movie will not be about the Koran this time, it will be about the Islamisation of the West. And with all those people, all those weak leaders who are responsible about that. About the consequenses, for example of free speech in our societies. And I assure you that I will continue with my struggle to fight for freedom, because a struggle indeed it is. After Fitna had been screened for the first time, last year march, there were threats all over. There were threats for even economical boycots to the Netherlands, our Dutch flag was burned all over the Middle East. I was [thursted?] with myself in the Netherlands, in Jordan and France. The problems that we spoke about in the United Kingdom. I was not allowed to enter Indonesia and many other countries. Al Qaeda was trying to kill me, made a Fatwa over me. I lived in prison cells. Ladies and gentlemen, it's terrible but let me tell you one thing, it's not about me. It's about our freedom, our own freedom. The freedom of you, your children, and your grand children is at stake here. And we should stand up and we should defend it. We should fight for our children's freedom. (applause)
Ladies and gentlemen, I told you at the beginning of my speech that I was going to be honest, so I gave you a lot of bad news. Fortunately, at least in Europe, there is also some good news. There is no doubt in my mind that, at the end of the day, even though it's five minutes to twelve, freedom will prevail. And there are already some hopeful signs. For instance: Last week the Dutch parliament approved a motion, proposed a motion by my own Party for Freedom, that said that there any dialogue from any government with Hamas should be blocked. (applause)
Another part of the good news is that, according to the most recent opinion polls, if elections were held today in the Netherlands, my party, The Party of Freedom, would be the largest party in the Netherlands. (applause, cheering)
As a matter of fact you might be looking at the new prime minister. (applause, more cheering)
And so, and so, I ask you all, I gave you this example of my party and the popularity in the Netherlands, if it can be done in the Netherlands, if it can be done in the Netherlands, why not throughout the whole Western world. It's possible ladies and gentlemen, it can be done. If the Netherlands were the first country to end up this whole multi-culturalism, this cultural radicalism swamp, why can other countries not follow. (applause)
Finally, finally, ladies and gentlemen, I have not forgotten those to whom we owe our liberties. Our liberties in Europe liberties were bitterly fought for. It were American soldiers who bled and died for European freedom. And those American soldiers did not die for Islamised Europe, they died for a free Europe.
We owe, we all owe, we all in Europe owe something to this brave men. Their legacy cannot and will not ..... AH WAT EEN GELUL IK TREK HET NIET LANGER.
Wilders was volgens Teeven harder als ie zich veilig waande. En inderdaad.
[beginning of fragment]
...about the nature of Islam. Admit that the is Islam is not a religion. Admit that the is Islam is totalitaran ideology. In other words: The right to religious freedom do not apply to this totalitaran ideology called Islam.
Stop, also, the mass immigration from people from muslim countries. (applause) Stop the immigration of muslims... (applause) And besides ... encourage the repatriation to the same countries.
And, ladies and gentlemen, for those people who are already in our country, for those muslims who are already in our societies, if they behave, if they assimilate according to our rules, of course they are equal to anybody else. But if they become criminal, if they act in a criminal way, please don't send them to a social worker, send them abroad, de-naturalise them, send them... (applause)
Ladies and gentlemen, I have many other solutions. But the most important thing I believe is that we should get rid of weak leadership. (applause) [the lack of leaders in Europe?]
We have... All of us have the privilege of living in a democracy. Let's use that privilege and exchange all those cowards that are leading so many countries of the world, exchange those cowards for hero's. We need more Churchills, and we need less [gentlemens?]
In fact, in fact, we have to go on the offensive. We have to stand up and stop fighting back, we must no longer allow ourselves to remain seated in our cosy armchairs and get trembled over. If they bombard us with sharia law, we will bombard them back with our human rights. If they bombard us with court cases, we shall bombard them back with our court cases. We have to fight back, ladies and gentlemen. millions, millions of people in the world are sick and tired of it all. They refuse to take any more of this cowardness. We must make it clear, we must make it clear to all those people that millions of us, millions of freedom loving people are saying: "enough is enough". (applause)
And this in fact is the reason that last week I announced the sequel, another movie in the next, the year 2010, the sequel of Fitna 2. The movie will not be about the Koran this time, it will be about the Islamisation of the West. And with all those people, all those weak leaders who are responsible about that. About the consequenses, for example of free speech in our societies. And I assure you that I will continue with my struggle to fight for freedom, because a struggle indeed it is. After Fitna had been screened for the first time, last year march, there were threats all over. There were threats for even economical boycots to the Netherlands, our Dutch flag was burned all over the Middle East. I was [thursted?] with myself in the Netherlands, in Jordan and France. The problems that we spoke about in the United Kingdom. I was not allowed to enter Indonesia and many other countries. Al Qaeda was trying to kill me, made a Fatwa over me. I lived in prison cells. Ladies and gentlemen, it's terrible but let me tell you one thing, it's not about me. It's about our freedom, our own freedom. The freedom of you, your children, and your grand children is at stake here. And we should stand up and we should defend it. We should fight for our children's freedom. (applause)
Ladies and gentlemen, I told you at the beginning of my speech that I was going to be honest, so I gave you a lot of bad news. Fortunately, at least in Europe, there is also some good news. There is no doubt in my mind that, at the end of the day, even though it's five minutes to twelve, freedom will prevail. And there are already some hopeful signs. For instance: Last week the Dutch parliament approved a motion, proposed a motion by my own Party for Freedom, that said that there any dialogue from any government with Hamas should be blocked. (applause)
Another part of the good news is that, according to the most recent opinion polls, if elections were held today in the Netherlands, my party, The Party of Freedom, would be the largest party in the Netherlands. (applause, cheering)
As a matter of fact you might be looking at the new prime minister. (applause, more cheering)
And so, and so, I ask you all, I gave you this example of my party and the popularity in the Netherlands, if it can be done in the Netherlands, if it can be done in the Netherlands, why not throughout the whole Western world. It's possible ladies and gentlemen, it can be done. If the Netherlands were the first country to end up this whole multi-culturalism, this cultural radicalism swamp, why can other countries not follow. (applause)
Finally, finally, ladies and gentlemen, I have not forgotten those to whom we owe our liberties. Our liberties in Europe liberties were bitterly fought for. It were American soldiers who bled and died for European freedom. And those American soldiers did not die for Islamised Europe, they died for a free Europe.
We owe, we all owe, we all in Europe owe something to this brave men. Their legacy cannot and will not ..... AH WAT EEN GELUL IK TREK HET NIET LANGER.
B-sting: Wat ik dus ook al riep
toen iemand de YouTube-versi...
Parallaxhhh: Inderdaad, dat is
'handhaving'. Als ik ooit van die...
Parallaxhhh: Volgens mij is dat
niet eens politie.
Roel Zwaar: Er is een enorme run op rollators ontstaan... Oh, ...
Ahmed baby!: Leuk filmpje, en
een tekst er bij die hij schreef i...

Monade - category B traitor: En apropos irriterende woorden:
het zijn vooral leu...
Monade - category B traitor: En Inez van Eijk - "Ik zeg maar
zo ik zeg maar niks...
gronk: Kuitenbrouwer. Hele oeuvre.
Wildplasser, beroepsweigeraar: Trouwens @gronk: een
constructie als “niet ge...
Wildplasser, beroepsweigeraar: Mensen die veel stopwoordjes
en tussenwerpselen geb...

Totaal aantal: 1379
Waaronder de leden:
Mr Nelson DDWW, Steampimp. DuffCut trekpet Nick Name, niet blond RRRobert Akahige Parallaxhhh Wildplasser, beroepsweig Tralala Tha KinGuiN- arrogante R Graaftak, dhimmi Kale kip Jazzper Witjoekel Vilmer Eg TheStef Monade - category B trai Pikey2ndViolin4ever barq Der Webmeister koffieverkeerd gronk pedigree tapmarin
Mr Nelson DDWW, Steampimp. DuffCut trekpet Nick Name, niet blond RRRobert Akahige Parallaxhhh Wildplasser, beroepsweig Tralala Tha KinGuiN- arrogante R Graaftak, dhimmi Kale kip Jazzper Witjoekel Vilmer Eg TheStef Monade - category B trai Pikey2ndViolin4ever barq Der Webmeister koffieverkeerd gronk pedigree tapmarin















Maar dan is ineens aanpassing aan een ander geloof wel goed?
@Ed
jwt
Een religieuze groep vrijwel in zijn geheel classificeren als crimineel c.q. ongewenst en daar een politieke ideologie op uitbouwen - en het JOODSE publiek luistert ademloos en kritiekloos toe.
Wondere Wereld [/Chriet]
Weet je wie ook eindoplossingen had?
Ik blijf me verbazen dat de wilders-haters er zo op hameren dat de ideeën van de PVV 'gevaarlijk' zouden zijn, met de onvermijdelijke godwin er meteen achteraan. En maar emmeren over de persoon van wilders met zijn verspreiding van zijn 'gevaarlijke opvattingen'. Het komt bij weinigen op dat die opvattingen nou eenmaal leven onder de samenleving, en dat er vroeg of laat een partij komt die zulke opvattingen vertaalt in beleid. Hoe ga je als links-mens dat nou echt effectief aanpakken; door die partij en partijleider te 'ontmaskeren' (hahaha!) óf door goede alternatieven aan te dragen en zo de samenleving op andere gedachten te brengen? Vooralsnog zie ik alleen de eerste aanpak. In de peilingen is te zien hoe effectief deze is.
Wat nou problemen, neem een reisje naar de rest van de wereld en je ziet dat wij allemaal als koningen leven en dan nog niet een eerrlijke prijs voor onze koffie willen betalen.
Wilders is een verblinde huilebalk die nog niets in zijn leven werkelijk op waarde heeft leren schatten. Zijn kiezers zijn ongemotiveerd, niet creatief, verwend, onzelfstandig en vooral zeer lokaal geinformeerd.
Niet iedere opvatting die in de maatschappij leeft moet worden omgezet in beleid. Neem de pedopartij, bijvoorbeeld. Waarom zou je daar 'goede alternatieven' voor moeten aandragen?
Hetzelfde met de PVV. Het 'progressieve' deel van de bevolking zit massaal te huilen tegen Wilders en de PVV, maar snappen blijkbaar niet dat in een democratie bestaande ideeën uiteindelijk via de politiek naar boven komen. Het is dan aan de kiezer om die ideeën op waarde te schatten, maar het is hoe dan ook een beetje suf om een partij of individu de schuld te geven van het bestaan van die ideeën.
Dan zou je ook nog democratie zelf flauwekul kunnen vinden (valt wat voor te zeggen) zoals leitkultur hierboven doet, met zijn constateringen (?) over de PVV-stemmers. Zou door de constatering te uiting de PVV-stemmer van mening veranderen? Of zou het helemaal beter zijn om die mensen niet te laten stemmen? Alle stemgerechtigden gelijk, maar sommige meer gelijk dan anderen.
Verder helemaal eens met Leitkultur. We moeten uitgaan van de positieve kant, hoe moeilijk dat soms ook te verkopen is. Leitkultur vergeet nog het meest opzienbarende te vermelden, ik sta er elke keer weer paf van: je kan hier in elke supermarkt kiezen uit minimaal tien verschillende soorten pleepapier. Materiaal om je reet mee af te vegen. Waar we nog voor betalen ook. En waar we dan nog kennelijk uit soorten willen kiezen. Hoe overdadig wil je het hebben?
Een paar jaar geleden ging een of ander actualiteitenprogram op zoek naar "armoede in Nederland", en die kwamen niet verder dan een gezin dat al 12 jaar dezelfde keuken had, en geen geld had voor een nieuwe. Brrr ...
Ik zeg: onderwijs. Daar moeten we in investeren, juist nu. Gigantische opbrengsten, en minder dom kiesvolk. En vooral investeren in het aanzien van onderwijs: het is nu gewoon helemaal 'cool' om niet naar school te gaan, onder grote groepen van de bevolking. Als je het weer 'cool' weet te maken om juist wel wat te weten, is er al veel gewonnen.
Hetzelfde heb je ook met de PVV: een fors gedeelte van de PVV-stemmers stemt niet PVV vanwege Geeeeert's islamstandpunten, maar uit onvrede met bestaande partijen en instituties. En dat is grotendeels dezelfde onvrede die Fortuyn ook verwoordde, alleen deed Fortuyn dat wel op een veel intelligentere manier. En die onvrede is deels terecht, maar aan de andere kant ook de consequentie van het leven in een maatschappij waar iedere beslissing uitgepolderd moet worden. Als fortuyn niet was vermoord maar aan de macht was gekomen als 'president', dan vermoed-ik dat-ie binnen jaar alsnog was vermoord -- en ditmaal door z'n eigen kiezers.
Stel hè
inbij de grondwet. Een 'artikel 0' dat niet door een 2/3 meerderheid gewijzigd kan worden, en waar in staat dat de democratie zichzelf niet kan opheffen, ook al wil het volk dat.Het probleem is denk ik de handhaving. Wie ga je roepen als een absolute meerderheid het artikel schrapt? De Koningin?
En voor dat heil zoeken we nog even een ander woord
[/held]
*bouwt achterhuis*
"Wilders was volgens Teeven harder als ie zich veilig waande. En inderdaad."
[beginning of fragment]
...about the nature of Islam. Admit that the is Islam is not a religion. Admit that the is Islam is totalitaran ideology. In other words: The right to religious freedom do not apply to this totalitaran ideology called Islam.
Stop, also, the mass immigration from people from muslim countries. (applause) Stop the immigration of muslims... (applause) And besides ... encourage the repatriation to the same countries.
And, ladies and gentlemen, for those people who are already in our country, for those muslims who are already in our societies, if they behave, if they assimilate according to our rules, of course they are equal to anybody else. But if they become criminal, if they act in a criminal way, please don't send them to a social worker, send them abroad, de-naturalise them, send them... (applause)
Ladies and gentlemen, I have many other solutions. But the most important thing I believe is that we should get rid of weak leadership. (applause) [the lack of leaders in Europe?]
We have... All of us have the privilege of living in a democracy. Let's use that privilege and exchange all those cowards that are leading so many countries of the world, exchange those cowards for hero's. We need more Churchills, and we need less [gentlemens?]
In fact, in fact, we have to go on the offensive. We have to stand up and stop fighting back, we must no longer allow ourselves to remain seated in our cosy armchairs and get trembled over. If they bombard us with sharia law, we will bombard them back with our human rights. If they bombard us with court cases, we shall bombard them back with our court cases. We have to fight back, ladies and gentlemen. millions, millions of people in the world are sick and tired of it all. They refuse to take any more of this cowardness. We must make it clear, we must make it clear to all those people that millions of us, millions of freedom loving people are saying: "enough is enough". (applause)
And this in fact is the reason that last week I announced the sequel, another movie in the next, the year 2010, the sequel of Fitna 2. The movie will not be about the Koran this time, it will be about the Islamisation of the West. And with all those people, all those weak leaders who are responsible about that. About the consequenses, for example of free speech in our societies. And I assure you that I will continue with my struggle to fight for freedom, because a struggle indeed it is. After Fitna had been screened for the first time, last year march, there were threats all over. There were threats for even economical boycots to the Netherlands, our Dutch flag was burned all over the Middle East. I was [thursted?] with myself in the Netherlands, in Jordan and France. The problems that we spoke about in the United Kingdom. I was not allowed to enter Indonesia and many other countries. Al Qaeda was trying to kill me, made a Fatwa over me. I lived in prison cells. Ladies and gentlemen, it's terrible but let me tell you one thing, it's not about me. It's about our freedom, our own freedom. The freedom of you, your children, and your grand children is at stake here. And we should stand up and we should defend it. We should fight for our children's freedom. (applause)
Ladies and gentlemen, I told you at the beginning of my speech that I was going to be honest, so I gave you a lot of bad news. Fortunately, at least in Europe, there is also some good news. There is no doubt in my mind that, at the end of the day, even though it's five minutes to twelve, freedom will prevail. And there are already some hopeful signs. For instance: Last week the Dutch parliament approved a motion, proposed a motion by my own Party for Freedom, that said that there any dialogue from any government with Hamas should be blocked. (applause)
Another part of the good news is that, according to the most recent opinion polls, if elections were held today in the Netherlands, my party, The Party of Freedom, would be the largest party in the Netherlands. (applause, cheering)
As a matter of fact you might be looking at the new prime minister. (applause, more cheering)
And so, and so, I ask you all, I gave you this example of my party and the popularity in the Netherlands, if it can be done in the Netherlands, if it can be done in the Netherlands, why not throughout the whole Western world. It's possible ladies and gentlemen, it can be done. If the Netherlands were the first country to end up this whole multi-culturalism, this cultural radicalism swamp, why can other countries not follow. (applause)
Finally, finally, ladies and gentlemen, I have not forgotten those to whom we owe our liberties. Our liberties in Europe liberties were bitterly fought for. It were American soldiers who bled and died for European freedom. And those American soldiers did not die for Islamised Europe, they died for a free Europe.
We owe, we all owe, we all in Europe owe something to this brave men. Their legacy cannot and will not ..... AH WAT EEN GELUL IK TREK HET NIET LANGER.
O partigiano, portami via,
o bella, ciao! bella, ciao! bella, ciao, ciao, ciao!
O partigiano, portami via,
ché mi sento di morir.
Oefen maar vast!
Je hebt zin om te sterven?
Greet begon een paar jaar terug met de uitspraak 'Ik heb niks tegen de islam, ik heb wat tegen de uitwassen van de islam'. Tegenwoordig bestaat de islam niet als religie en moet het bestreden worden.
Als iemand zo snel radicaler wordt in zijn uitspraken vind ik hem of haar eng.
Maar ja, roep maar eens 'alle fundamentalisten moeten nederland worden uitgezet' zonder zelf uitgemaakt te worden voor fundamentalist.